9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (10) TMI 296X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sh Sundar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.R.Hemalatha, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and with their consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to implement the order passed by the first respondent dated 23.12.2015. 3. The petitioner. a Singapore c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ustoms (Appeals), who by an order dated 23.03.2015, partly allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner and reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 6,00,000/- from Rs. 13,00,000/- and penalty to Rs. 1,50,000/- from Rs. 2,50,000/-, however, rejected the appeal preferred by the Revenue. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent Department filed a Revision dated 03.03.2016 as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ew Delhi. 7. Be that as it may, admittedly, as on date there is no order of stay granted by the Revisional Authority. Therefore, the second respondent is bound to implement the order passed by the first respondent. However, this Court is inclined to grant some time to the Department to move an application for stay before the Revisional Authority, if they so desire. 8. Accordingly, the second res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
