SC scrutinized a corruption case involving alleged bribe demand ...

Corruption Case Dismissed: Critical Evidence Gaps Undermine Prosecution's Narrative, Accused Acquitted Under Benefit of Doubt Principle

May 22, 2025

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

SC scrutinized a corruption case involving alleged bribe demand and acceptance. Despite prosecution's claims, critical evidentiary inconsistencies emerged regarding the sequence of events, trap procedure, and witness testimonies. The key witnesses' statements contained material contradictions that undermined the prosecution's narrative. The court found the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the SC set aside the lower courts' conviction, emphasizing procedural safeguards in trap cases and the necessity of unimpeachable evidence in corruption allegations. The appellant was acquitted, with the court highlighting the importance of rigorous judicial scrutiny in such proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

SC scrutinized a corruption case involving alleged bribe demand ...

Corruption Case Dismissed: Critical Evidence Gaps Undermine Prosecution's Narrative, Accused Acquitted Under Benefit of Doubt Principle

May 22, 2025

Case Laws Indian Laws SC

You may also like:

HC held that a public servant cannot be prosecuted for criminal conspiracy under Section 120-B IPC when sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act...

Seeking grant of bail - Evasion of GST - The High Court identified several deficiencies in the prosecution's case. Firstly, the absence of prior sanction from the...

Petition u/s 227 of Criminal Procedure Code for discharge dismissed. Allegations in complaint constitute offence of money laundering u/s 3 of PMLA. Prosecution of...

HC dismissed second appeal concerning damages claimed for alleged malicious prosecution following dishonored cheque case. Plaintiff failed to establish essential...

HC rejected discharge application in money laundering case involving Resolution Professional (RP). Court affirmed RPs qualify as public servants under Prevention of...

Competency of ITAT to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution – Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is not competent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution - HC

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to abatement caused by non-prosecution of the case. The Tribunal held that adjourning a matter beyond three...

Prosecution u/s 276CC and 276C (1) - The absence of assessee in India or the communication gap between herself and her representative cannot be a ground to quash the...

Recovery of narcotics from a vehicle which was stopped during transit - Ganja - contraband item - procedure of search and seizure governed by Section 43 read with...

Conviction u/ss 420, 467, 468, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) and 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Petitioner worked as Appraiser in Customs office....

Clandestine Removal - reliability of statements - sufficiency of evidence or not - In a serious case such as evasion of duty by fraud, the degree of appreciation of...

Procedure for identification and processing of cases for prosecution under Direct Tax Laws

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR PROSECUTION IN CASES OF TDS/TCS DEFAULT - Circular

The High Court quashed the conviction of the Applicant under the Customs Act and the Gold (Control) Act. The prosecution failed to follow the prescribed procedure u/s...

The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and 278E for tax evasion was invalid as it violated CBDT guidelines. Prosecution was premature without the...

Quick Updates: