9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 169X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... STICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Counsel for the petitioner has restricted the prayer in this petition for a direction to the respondents to permit the petitioner to operate the petitioner's bank account No.00602320009719 with HDFC bank. We have therefore, examined only this limited prayer. 2. This prayer arise in the following background. The petitioner is a trader engaged in the business of trading ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dition of the petitioner depositing sum of Rs. 1,50,000/which the petitioner did. For the year 20112012, a similar demand of Rs. 1.54 crores (rounded off) towards tax interest and penalty was raised. In this case also, the First Appeal came to be dismissed on 19.12.2015. In Second Appeal, the Tribunal by an order dated 27.1.2016 granted interim stay on the condition of petitioner depositing sum of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er. Admittedly, no fresh attachment was made after 12.2.2014. 3. learned AGP did not controvert that after 12.2.2014, no extension of fresh order of attachment was passed. He also could not controvert that by virtue of the interim order and the final order passed by the VAT Tribunal presently, it would not be possible for the department to recover any further tax dues from the petitioner, the pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
