2014 (1) TMI 1792

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Kang (Vice President) Heard both sides. 2. Appellant filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-II. 3. The brief facts of the case are that appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Anti HIV formulations and were working under the Cenvat Credit Scheme. The appellants were availing credit in respect of the duty paid inputs us .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of duty. Therefore, the reversal of credit availed on inputs is not to be reversed at the time of availing exemption notification and relying upon the following decisions of the Honble High Courts: (i) Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. HMT (TD) Ltd. 2010-TIOL-316-HC-P&H-CX (ii) Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Excise, Chandigarh 2012 (279) ELT 194 (H.P.) (iii) Commissioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ai Esoofbhai Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta reported in 1999 (107) ELT 557 to submit that refund of credit is not admissible. 7. We find that the claim of the appellant was rejected on merits by the lower authorities on the ground that the appellants required to reverse the credit of duty paid on inputs contained in the finished products lying in stock on the date appellant opted for e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X