TMI Blog2017 (6) TMI 910X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... G. Natarajan JUDGMENT 1. This appeal was admitted on 07.04.2016. The Court, at that time, framed two questions of law for adjudication. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the first question of law, will suffice. The said question of law, being : "(i) Whether the CESTAT was correct in holding that the assessee is entitled to avail the CENVAT credit on 'rent a cab services/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... view has also been followed by another Division Bench of this Court in the judgment dated 08.12.2016, passed in C.M.A.No.2586 of 2016, titled : Commissioner of Central Excise III V. M/s.Visteon Automotive Systems India (P) Limited. 5. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. The impugned judgment is sustained. The question of law, as framed, is answered in favour of the Assessee ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|