2008 (12) TMI 781

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... anga & Co., for the respondent. JUDGEMENT Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. The appellant has raised following questions of law- (i) Whether the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ITAT was justified in upholding the order of CIT (A) in deleting the disallowance of ₹ 20,15,85,238/- made by way of capital expenditure o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... erused the judgment and order of the Tribunal dated 3rd May, 2007. The Tribunal gave its finding as under- "2.4 The intial expenses directly incurred for raising capital are in nature and cannot be allowed by way of deduction as revenue expenditure. But the proposition would apply in a case where the expenditure incurred and the capital raised is by one and the same assessee. In the assesse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he assessee to incur expenses, otherwise than the expenses incurred were not in dispute. The expenses incurred were the assessee's own expenditure and it was a part and parcel of the profit-making activity of the assessee. The expenditure had a direct nexus with the assessee's own business of asset management. There was no valid basis to treat the expenses in question as capital in character, as i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X