2017 (10) TMI 508

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... For The Respondent : Sh. Nagraj Naik, Deputy Commissioner (AR) [Order per: Sulekha Beevi, C.S.] 1. The above appeal is filed against the rejection of refund claim. 2. On behalf of the appellant, the Ld. Counsel Sh. V.J. Sankaram submitted that the appellant is a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit holding service tax registration for providing taxable services under the category of Information Tec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in it is stated that the appellant has to obtain approval of the list of taxable services it is submitted by the Counsel, that the appellant had obtained approval before filing of refund claim and had submitted the refund claim along with such approval letter. He argued that therefore, the rejection of refund claim is without any basis. 3. The Ld. AR Sh. Nagraj Naik reiterated the findings in the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X