2017 (10) TMI 1228

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... vocate For the Appellant Shri Naveen Kushalappa, Jt. Commissioner(AR) For the Respondent ORDER We have heard the parties on the stay application and perused the records.  As per the impugned order, the appellants are required to deposit an amount of Rs. 4,52,63,024/-, which was taken and wrongly utilised excess credit during the period 01/04/2009 to 31/03/2010, under Rule 14 of the CENVAT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e earlier period has directed appellant to predeposit 10% (approx.) of the confirmed demand by various orders viz. i. Stay Order No.1212/2012 dt. 12/07/2012; ii. Stay Order No.25604/2013 dt. 16/04/2013. 3.   On the other hand the learned AR submitted that the appellant may be put to terms for hearing the appeal as the appellant has violated the rules. 4.   After hearing both .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X