9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (1) TMI 1474X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , DR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : V. Padmanabhan, Member (T)]. - The appeal is directed against the order dated 19-3-2014, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), IGI Airport, New Delhi. The appellant filed a Bill of Entry No. 8343806, dated 29-10-2012 and declared import of unbranded motorcycle parts. On the basis of prior intelligence, Customs Officers, on 100% examination of the impo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... well as imposed penalties. When the order was challenged before Commissioner (Appeals), he did not interfere with the confiscation of counterfeit goods. However, in respect of horns, the redemption fine and penalties were reduced. He upheld the re-determination of value for the horns. 2. In the present appeal the appellant has submitted that the supplier has issued a certificate dated 16-2-2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 6 (332) E.L.T. 525 (Cal.) (iii) Farookh S. Todywalla v. Commissioner - 2015 (323) E.L.T. A72 (S.C.) (iv) Commissioner of Cus., C.Ex. and S.T., Ghaziabad v. Met Trade (India) Ltd. - 2015 (318) E.L.T. 131. 3. Heard Shri Prabhjyoti K. Chadha, learned Advocate, as well as Dr. S.K. Sheoran, learned Departmental Representative, for the Revenue. 4. The ld ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntly, misdeclaration of the imported goods stands established and the goods are liable for confiscation under Section 111(m) and 111(l) of the Customs Act, 1962. In this regard, the findings by both the authorities below merit no interference. 6. The appellant has submitted correspondence with the supplier, who has admitted that wrong consignment has been sent to the appellant with reference ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
