TMI Blog2008 (10) TMI 689X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed as on day's list. It is under Section 10F of the Companies Act and is directed against the order dated 15.10.2008 passed by the Company Law Board (hereafter the Board) which is to the following effect : Application mentioned. Counsel appearing for the Respondents seek time to file reply to the same by 25th October, 2008 and rejoinder by 2nd November, 2008. The application will be heard ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ts prayed for should be allowed. There is no reference to any fact or the context in which the amendments were sought to be allowed. There is no mention of what grounds were urged in opposition and why such grounds were unmeritorious. The Tribunal need not have expended pages over the matter but it was necessary to indicate why the order came to be passed. 14. The order impugned does not show i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vance copy of the affidavit in opposition shall be served on the applicants by 2nd November, 2008; reply thereto, if any, may be filed by 4th November, 2008. Having regard to allegations and counter-allegations levelled by the parties in respect of factual events which transpired before the Board on 15.10.08 leading to the impugned order, this Court is of the considered view that the parties ou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
