TMI Blog2017 (12) TMI 541X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lant Shri R.N. Sharma, Advocate, Shri Ranjan Khanna, D.R. - for the respondent ORDER Per: B. Ravichandran These three appeals are against the common impugned order dated 11.4.2012 of Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur. This case is adjudicated by the original authority who confirmed the recovery of Rs. 2,13,55,253/- from M/s Shree Balajee Impex owned by Shri Kailashpati Agrawal. The all ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the appellants under Rule 26 may be set aside. 3. The ld. AR contested the appeals stating that role of each of the appellant has been brought out by clear corroborative evidences which will show that they have knowingly involved in deliberate acts resulting in loss of Govt. revenue and abetted the act of main party in whose names the exports were supposed to have made to Bangladesh. He specifi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ta also a Director of M/s Unique Ltd. opened a bank account in his capacity as the Director and also opened a joint account with shri Pramod in the same bank. These two bank accounts were extensively used to transfer the sale proceeds and the illegal gains that accrued by diversion of goods which were originally procured without payment of duty and intended for export, but diverted to domestic mar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|