Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2003 (4) TMI 62

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... erroneous in law. - - - - - Dated:- 4-4-2003 - Judge(s) : R. JAYASIMHA BABU., K. RAVIRAJA PANDIAN. JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by K. RAVIRAJA PANDIAN J.-At the instance of the Revenue, in respect of the assessment year 1987-88, the Tribunal referred the following question for the opinion of this court. The referred question goes as follows: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law and had valid materials to hold that medical expenditure incurred in connection with by-pass surgery of the managing director and also the travelling expenses in this connection incurred by the director and managing director's wife were to be treated as business expenses allowab .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he spindle capacity was also proposed and taking into consideration the hard and untiring efforts of the managing director, the board of directors felt that the services of the managing director were essential for the assessee-company and passed a resolution to bear the medical as well as travelling expenses of the managing director, held that the claim of the assessee was justified and allowed the same. Not satisfied with the order of the Appellate Tribunal, the above reference has been made at the instance of the Revenue. Learned counsel for the Revenue, Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, has contended that merely because a resolution has been passed by the board of directors to incur the medical expenses of the managing director, de hors any such .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ckets of Sri A.M.M. Arunachalam and his wife for their travel to the U.K. and purchased demand drafts and travellers cheques in foreign currency for Sri Arunachalam's treatment and the living expenses of Sri Arunachalam, his wife and a relative, who was also a director of the assessee-company, in the U.K., which trip was undertaken for a by-pass surgery for Sri Arunachalam. The amount so spent was not an amount which the company was required to spend under the terms of the contract of employment of Sri Arunachalam with the company. This court after taking into consideration the terms of employment and also taking into account the resolution passed by the board of directors resolving to bear the entire expenditure for the by-pass surgery by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ITR 695 (Mad). This court in the case of Rane (Madras) Ltd. v. CIT [2003] 259 ITR 307, while answering the question that the reimbursement of the medical expenses made to the directors/divisional managers/secretary of the company constitutes benefit or amenity to them and, hence, the amount given as reimbursement had to be taken into account for computing ceiling under section 40(c) or section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, has answered the question in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee by referring to the earlier judgment of this court in Sundaram Industries Ltd. v. CIT [1999] 239 ITR 405. The same is the view taken by this court in the case of Ennore Foundries Ltd. v. CIT [2003] 259 ITR 414, wherein also this court held that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... There is no material to prove that the payment made was one which had any link with the quantum of salary or other benefits to the managing director. As a matter of fact, a specific finding has been recorded by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) that the amount was paid outside its contractual obligation at paragraph 6 of its order. It is not the case of the assessee also that the managing director had any expectation of getting the amount from the assessee for medical treatment. Hence, the payment so made cannot be regarded as having been made on the ground of commercial expediency, in order indirectly to facilitate the carrying on of the business of the assessee. The gratuitous payment like the one made by the assessee cannot be reg .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates