2018 (4) TMI 366

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... esh Kumar, J. For the Petitioner(s):- SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN SRI.T.S.SARATH, ADVS. For the Respondent(s):- SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDHEEN, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER. JUDGMENT When this Court entertained a doubt as to whether the petitioners in this writ petition can maintain a joint writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition in so far as it relates .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... detained by the second respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax and the Kerala State Goods and Services Act on account of the discrepancy of the documents, and the first petitioner has been given Ext.P1 notice directing them to show cause why action shall not be taken against them under Section 129 of the CGST and SGST Acts. 5. According to the first petitioner, they hav .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X