2018 (4) TMI 366

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - the crew of the vehicle interchanged the documents of the goods to be delivered to the first petitioner and to the distributor at Ottappalam - Held that: - The grievance voiced by the first petitioner is one to be raised before the adjudicating authority under Section 129 of the CGST and SGST Acts - petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to complete the proceedings initiated in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is granted. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the first petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader. 4. The case of the first petitioner is that certain goods have been consigned by M/s.GlaxoSmithKline through the second petitioner transporter to the first petitioner as also to a distributor at Ottappalam; that the crew of the vehicle interchanged the documents of the goods to be delive .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t them. 6. The grievance voiced by the first petitioner is one to be raised before the adjudicating authority under Section 129 of the CGST and SGST Acts. In the said view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to complete the proceedings initiated in terms of Ext.P1 notice against the first petitioner within a week from the date of receipt of a copy of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X