9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (6) TMI 1124X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as, Sri.K. John Mathai And Smt.Preetha S. Nair JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. The appellant is the Commissioner of Income Tax, who is aggrieved with the order of the Tribunal, which set aside the reassessment under Section 147 read with Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the ground of there being no suppression of material facts. The re-assessment proceedings were admittedly taken for t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 04-2008 and a further notice under Section 143(2) on 24-02-2008 was issued. The reasons recorded for re-opening of assessment was communicated to the assessee and an order was passed as Annexure A; reducing considerably the deduction granted under Section 80HHC. Aggrieved by such order, the assessee was before the first appellate authority which stood rejected as per Annexure B. A further appeal t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... very inception and always retrospective: i. Is not the return originally filed by the assessee inconsistent with the declaration of the law by the Supreme Court ? ii. The original return being inconsistent with the decision of the Supreme Court from the inception of filing the return, is not the return filed not fully and truly disclosing material facts ? iii. Is not the original return, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the order which interfered with assessment and the first appellate order, on grounds of invalidity of a re-assessment under Section 147. 5. We also notice that the returns originally filed was in accordance with the declaration of law of this Court in CIT v. K.Rajendranathan Nair, [2004] 265 ITR 35 . The said decision was reversed by the Honourable Supreme Court in CIT v. K.Ravindranathan Nair, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
