TMI Blog1924 (4) TMI 2X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e plaintiffs has been prevented from acting as Director. The facts shortly stated are that at a meeting of the share-holders of the Company which was held on the 32nd Ashar 1329 the plaintiff No. 2 and defendants 1, 2 and 3 were elected Directors. The meeting was subsequently adjourned and the adjourned meeting was held on the 7th Sraban following. On that date on account of certain proceedings wh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the contention has been made that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain such a suit as this. It was also argued that having regard to the facts stated in the judgment of the Court of appeal below the Court ought not to interfere in this matter. 3. With regard to the second question we have only to observe that the learned Judge in the lower appellate Court took the matter into his co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rect provision in the law that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain such a suit it is a matter of internal management of a Company with which the Court has no jurisdiction to interfere and he cites in support of his contention the case of Mozley v. Alston 1 Phillips 790, and certain other cases following that case, In that case, however, there were various reasons on which the Lord Cha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
