TMI Blog2019 (7) TMI 1376X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... this Court in CIT v. Ankitech Private Limited [ 2011 (5) TMI 325 - DELHI HIGH COURT] which has been approved by the Supreme Court in CIT v. Madhur Housing and Development Corporation [ 2017 (10) TMI 1279 - SUPREME COURT] As Revenue submits that in National Travel Services vs. CIT [ 2018 (1) TMI 1159 - SUPREME COURT] a two Judge bench of the Supreme Court has doubted the correctness of the vi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing counsel Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing counsel for Revenue Respondent Through: None O R D E R CM Appl. No. 9892/2019 (delay) 1. For the reason stated in the application, the delay of 132 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned and the application is disposed of. ITA No. 201/2019 2. The Reven ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nue submits that in National Travel Services vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII (2018) 3 SCC 95 a two Judge bench of the Supreme Court has doubted the correctness of the view expressed by this Court in CIT v. Ankitech Private Limited (supra) which has been approved by Supreme Court in Madhur Housing (supra) and has accordingly referred the matter to a larger bench of the Supreme Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
