Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (1) TMI 1545

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he A. Y. 2010-11. IT(TP)A.256/Bang/2015 - By the Revenue : 2. First we take up the appeal of the revenue. Grounds raised are as under :- The ld. DR of revenue submitted that Grounds 1, 7 & 8 are general and no separate adjudication is called for in respect of these grounds. Regarding remaining grounds, he supported the draft assessment order and he also filed written submissions which mainly say that in T. P. analysis, the comparability cannot be decided on the basis of precedent case as the facts of each case on record needs to be addressed. Learned AR of the assessee supported the order of DRP. He also submitted that the issue involved in Grounds No. 2 & 3 in respect of corporate tax is covered in favour of the assessee by the judgm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d in the case of Tata Elxsi Ltd. (Supra), it was held that total turnover is sum total of Domestic Turnover and export Turnover and therefore, if any amount is reduced from Export Turnover than Total turnover also goes down by the same amount automatically. Respectfully following this judgment, this issue is decided in favour of the assessee and accordingly, Grounds 2 & 3 are rejected. 4. Regarding remaining grounds i.e. grounds 4 to 6 in respect of exclusion of various comparables, the issue regarding exclusion of R S Software India Ltd. Is decided in favour of the revenue in view of this fact that both sides are opposed to exclusion of this comparable. In respect of the remaining 6 comparables i.e. 1) Infosys Ltd., 2) Tata Elxsi Ltd., 3 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ut by the learned DR of the revenue. Accordingly, Ground No. 4 & 5 are rejected and Ground No. 6 is partly allowed. 5. In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed. CO No.71/Bang/2017 - By the assessee : 6. Regarding the C. O. of the assessee, learned AR of the assessee submitted that the C. O. is not pressed and accordingly, the C. O. is dismissed as not pressed. 7. In the result, the C. O. of the assessee is dismissed. IT(TP)A No.506/Bang/2015 - By the assessee : 8. The assessee has raised as many as 23 grounds but it was submitted by the learned AR of the assessee that only Grounds No. 12, 13, 15, 18.1 and 23 are pressed and remaining grounds are not pressed. Accordingly, these 5 grounds being pressed are reprod .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... submitted that as per this tribunal order, this is not a good comparable. Learned DR of the revenue supported the DRP order in the present case. 11. We have considered the rival submissions. We have already seen while deciding the appeal of the revenue that this tribunal order is applicable in the present case. Hence, respectfully following this tribunal order, we direct the AO/TPO to exclude L & T Infotech Ltd. from the final list of comparables. Ground No. 13 is allowed. 12. Ground No. 15 is about inclusion of R S Software (India) Limited. As per Ground No. 6 of the appeal of the revenue also, it is the request of the revenue that this comparable should not be excluded. Since both sides want inclusion of this comparable in the final l .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... efund is granted to the assessee under section 143 (1) and no refund is due on regular assessment or refund so granted u/s 143 91) exceeds the refund as per regular assessment, the assessee is liable for interest u/s 234D. In our considered opinion, for applicability of section 234D, issue of refund voucher is not a prerequirement and adjustment of refund against old demand is also granting of refund and section 234D is applicable if such refund is more than the refund allowable on regular assessment. In this view of the matter, Ground No. 23 is rejected. 25. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed. 26. In the combined result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed, C. O. filed by the assessee is dismissed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates