2019 (2) TMI 1768

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt. Shri Tarun Kumar, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER The matter is referred to us by raising objection that the appellant has failed to make mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944, therefore, the matter is listed before the Bench for consideration. 2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that in the impugned order, the appellant is proprietary concern of Shri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... p;Admittedly, the appellant has not complied with the said provisions for entertaining this appeal, in that circumstance, we are unable to hear the appeal filed by the appellant and pre-deposit made in another appeal cannot be treated as pre-deposit for this appellant. Therefore, we turn down the proposal made by the Ld. Counsel for the appellant. 5. Ld. Counsel further submits that the appe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X