9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (3) TMI 747X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd submitted that the issues on which the refund has been rejected in these appeals are as under : (i) Recipient of consideration is mentioned as Mumbai Unit in FIRC instead of Chennai Unit. (ii) The claim was held to be time barred by lower authority although no such finding by refund sanctioning authority. (iii) Non-submission of FIRCs (iv) Realization of amount through Cheque for which no FIRC was issued by bank. 3. With regard to the first issue as above, it is submitted by him that in the FIRC documents, the Mumbai unit was erroneously mentioned instead of Chennai unit. This was only an error committed by the bank and actually services were availed at Chennai unit. On the very same issue, for the subsequent periods refund ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... orex cheque and not foreign remittances. The banks had not issued FIRC documents for this reason. Ld. consultant submitted that cheques were credited to the overseas account of the appellant and then periodically remitted to India in convertible foreign exchange. Therefore the authorities ought not to have rejected the refund claims on these counts. 7. Ld. A.R. Ms.Sridevi. T. appeared and argued for the department. With regard to the first issue, she submitted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had, for the subsequent periods, verified necessary documents and reached the conclusion that the address noted in the FIRC was an error by oversight on the bank and refund claims for the subsequent period were allowed. 8. With regard to the ground o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aim on this ground requires to be set aside which we hereby do. 11. The third ground is with regard to non-submission of documents / FIRCs, Ld. consultant has requested for one more opportunity to submit the documents. Taking note of this, Appeal Nos. ST/42174/2018 to ST/42176/2018 in which this issue is aground for rejection are remanded to the adjudicating authority to reconsider on submission of documents. 12. Another reason for rejection is that the amount has been realized by Forex cheque and not by direct remittances. In our view, since bank has credited the amount to their account, the service tax paid on such consideration paid cannot be denied. Appeals ST/42176-42179/2018 in which this issue is a ground for rejection are remand ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
