TMI Blog2020 (3) TMI 1083X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he petitioner under Section 203AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 within stipulated time - HELD THAT:- 1st respondent, based on instruction, submitted that though it is true that the Bank has deducted tax from the petitioner's account and paid to the Income Tax Department, the Bank did not generate Form 26A and therefore, such payment has not reflected in the records maintained by the 1st responde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .M.P.No.1870 of 2019 - - - Dated:- 11-3-2020 - Mr. Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu For the Petitioner : Mr.P.Thiagarajan For the Respondents : Mrs.Hema Murali Krishnan, Standing Counsel (IT) for R1 Mr.C.Mohan for R2 ORDER The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus to direct the second respondent to submit the details of Deduction of Tax at Source on the amount deposited by the petitioner ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ver, for the interest accrued out of such deposit, the petitioner has to pay the income tax and that the same was deducted by the Bank. It is stated that the 2nd respondent Bank, instead of generating form 26A, issued Manual Form 16A to the petitioner as TDS towards the tax paid for the interest amount. Since Form 26A was not generated by the Bank, the records before the 1st respondent do not refl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed that if the petitioner approaches the 1st respondent with the above required application and enclosures, the 1st respondent will consider the same and pass appropriate orders. 5. In view of the above stated submissions made by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the 1st respondent by making application with nec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
