TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 1300X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat the installed capacity as on 09.10.2018 has to be considered by the respondent no. 1 for making allocation of RPC. The Minutes, however, do not show the consideration of documents that have been referred to hereinabove by the leaned senior counsel for the petitioners, by the respondent no. 1 while making such allocation. The respondent no. 1 is directed to consider the petition as a represe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the Public Notice No. 81 dated 22.03.2019, the respondent no. 1 has considered the claim of the petitioner by taking its installed capacity as 2,00,000 Metric Ton (MT) only. 2. Relying upon various documents including the Minutes of the Consortium of Banks meeting dated 05.05.2018, report dated 17.04.2018 of the Engineer appointed by the Consortium of Banks and the Site Inspection Report da ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cannot exceed 1.4 MT per annum in total. In view of the aforesaid, prayers made on the basis of expansion etc. are totally misconceived and cannot be entertained. No further orders are required to be passed on these I.As. i.e. I A. NOS. 168847/2018, 1451/2019 1847/2019 [filed on behalf of Rain CII carbon (Vizag) Ltd.], I.A. No.164303 (filed on behalf of Saket Agarwal), I.A. No.12291/2019 (file ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... erving as under:- Our order is clear. No further clarification is required. This application is disposed of. 6. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that as the first application was filed prior to the allocation having been made by the respondent no. 1 and the second application was also disposed of by the Supreme Court reiterating that 1.4 Million MT is the outer limit w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion. 8. In light of the above facts, the respondent no. 1 is directed to consider the petition as a representation of the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereon, within a period of four weeks from today. While taking such decision, the respondent no. 1 shall also grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 9. Needless to say if the petitioners are aggrieved of the decision tak ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
