9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (6) TMI 639X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Prem Ranjan Kumar, Advocate Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate O R D E R HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the complete inaction on the part of the respondent/Commissioner of Central Excise, post issuance of a Discharge Certificate dated 11.03.2020, whereafter the respondent was expected to have de-freezed its Saving Bank Account No.346010 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed to it and further, demanding a sum of Rs. 1,71,05,157/- from the petitioner towards export clearances from their CENVAT Credit account, as recovery. 3. Vide order dated 22.10.2008, the Adjudicating Officer confirmed the demand and denied CENVAT Credit of Rs. 1,74,10,417/- to the petitioner and also confirmed recovery of Rs. 1,71,05,157/- as Central Excise duty. Besides the above amount, some p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the tax dues. The petitioner had expected that the respondent would defreeze its bank account frozen on 26.05.2010 and release its lien on the LIC policy created in the year 2013, in due course. 5. After waiting for over three months, the petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that the respondent has failed to take appropriate action of defreezing its Saving Bank Account a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
