Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (4) TMI 1879

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ll as revenue is common in all the appeals, facts are pari-materia the same and common grounds of appeal have been raised in the cross-appeals, we dispose-off the same by way of this common order for the sake of convenience & brevity. Cross Appeals for AY 2009-10 The grounds raised by the revenue read as under: - 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 85,35,705/- on account of bogus purchases. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not considering that the addition was made on the basis of information received from DlT(lnv.) and sales Tax Department, Maharashtra with regard to bogus purchases made b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sider that reassessment proceeding cannot be initiated. a) No reassessment can be made just to make an enquiry or verification. b) Reassessment proceeding cannot be initiate merely on the information received from investigation wing. c) Reassessment proceeding cannot be initiated when the Ld. CIT(A) have reason to suspect and not reason to believe. 3. On the facts and circumstances of case and law the Ld CIT(A) erred in confirming the assessment order under section 143 sub section 3 r w s 147 of income tax Act which is passed against the principal of natural justice. 4. The Ld CIT(A) erred in confirming and rejecting the books of accounts under section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act. 5. The Ld CIT(A) erred in confirming and treati .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the assessee on 12/09/2009 which was processed u/s 143(1). The addition of Rs. 170.71 Lacs as made by Ld. AO on account of alleged bogus purchases is the sole subject matter of present appeal before us. 2.2 The reassessment proceedings got triggered pursuant to receipt of certain information from DGIT (Investigation) / Sales Tax Department, Maharashtra wherein it transpired that the assessee stood beneficiary of accommodation purchase bills aggregating to Rs. 682.85 Lacs from 36 suspicious entities, the details of which have already been extracted in para 3.1 of the quantum assessment order dated 13/03/2015. Accordingly, the case was reopened u/s 147 by issuance of notice u/s 148 on 20/03/2014 which was followed by statutory notices u/s 14 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h partial success before Ld. CIT(A) vide impugned order dated 01/11/2017, wherein the assessee submitted that payments to the suppliers was through banking channels. The Ld. first appellate authority, after considering assessees submissions, factual matrix, documentary evidences etc. came to a conclusion that the rejection of books was not justified. At the same time, inter-alia, relying upon the judgment of Honble Gujarat High Court rendered in CIT Vs. Simit P.Sheth [356 ITR 451] & CIT Vs. Bholanath Poly Fab. P. Ltd. [355 ITR 290], Ld. first appellate authority reduced the estimated additions to 12.5% as against 25% made by Ld. AO. The stand of Ld. first appellate authority has given rise to cross-appeals before us. 4. The Ld. Authorized .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ivery of material. Notices issued u/s 133(6) to all the suppliers did not elicit satisfactory response and the assessee failed to produce even a single supplier to confirm the transactions. Therefore, in such a situation, the addition, which could be made, was to account for profit element embedded in these purchase transactions to factorize for profit earned by assessee against possible purchase of material in the grey market and undue benefit of VAT against such bogus purchases, which Ld. first appellate authority has rightly done. However, keeping in view the fact that the assessee was dealing in low margin item like iron & steel which was subjected to lower VAT Rate, we restrict the impugned additions to 5% of alleged bogus purchases. T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates