9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (10) TMI 122X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 587004), seeking a direction to the Registrar of Companies, Kochi (hereinafter called as the 'ROC') to restore the name of the Company in the Register of Companies, maintained by the Registrar of Companies, Kochi, for the State of Kerala and Lakshadweep. The appellant company was incorporated on 13.12.2013 under the Companies Act, 1956. The Corporate Identification Number (CIN) of the Company is U93030KL2013PTC035649 having its Registered Office at Rayn Skin Clinic Private Limited, 25/1351-1, Lafemme, Thekemadom Road, Thrissur, Kerala- 680 001. As per the Memorandum of Association, the main business of the Appellant Company is: "to deal with skin diseases of clients or patients and to do its remedies, to help the customers to do skin care ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... within due dates as prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013. Thereafter, the Appellant company inadvertently failed to file the financial statements for a period of three consecutive financial years. 3. The ROC, who is Respondent herein, has filed a Report dated 16.09.2020 on 17.09.2020 stating that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide communication dated 25.06.2019 had instructed all Regional Directors and Registrars of Companies to take strike off action against companies which have failed to file Financial Statements or Annual Returns as per Chapter XVIII of the Companies Act, 2013 and have not filed application under Section 455(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 for making them as 'Dormant'. 4. It is further stated by the ROC, in the i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nies Act and also for not responding to the several periodical notices within the notice periods. Therefore, the action of strike off of the name of company is fully substantiated within the authority under the provisions of Section 248 of the Act and deserves the protection of this Tribunal. 6. I have heard the arguments advanced by the learned PCS for the appellant through video conferencing and had gone through the report dated 16.09.2020 submitted by Registrar of Companies in the instant appeal. Having satisfied with the reasons as mentioned in the appeal, the Tribunal is of the opinion that it would be just and proper to order restoration of the name of the Company in the Register of Companies. Hence this Tribunal pass the following o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
