Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (1) TMI 1091

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... edly, the petitioner is a trader in Pan Masala and other goods. It claims to have sold disputed goods to a dealer - Shri Durga Trading Company, Darjeeling, West Bengal, against its Tax Invoice nos. SAT/19-20/0059, dated 24.11.2019 and SAT/19-20/0060, also dated 24.11.2019. Two e-way bills were also prepared being e-way bill nos. 491096371734 and 491096371789. Both e-way bills were prepared on 24.11.2019 at 02.32 PM and 02.33 PM respectively. Bilty of M/s Ganpati Road Carriers Pvt. Ltd. being LR/321 and LR/322 were also prepared for transportation of those goods. 4. It is also undisputed that the goods in question along with the aforesaid two tax invoices, e-way bills and, two Bilty were found accompanying the goods on 28.11.2019 when the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not cancelled and the transportation of the goods commenced four days thereafter, it has been inferred that the said e-way bills had been reused. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Rule 138(9) of the Rules does not, in any way, provide either automatic cancellation of e-way bills or cancellation of e-way bills by way of necessary option to be adopted by a dealer, in case, the goods are not transported within 24 hours of such e-way bills being generated. Merely because transportation of the goods did not commence for four days thereafter, it may not itself lead to any adverse inference of second use of that e-way bills. Second, it has been submitted that, in any case, the reason for assessment and penalty has to be tested o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ot transported as per the details furnished in the e-way bill, the e-way bill may be cancelled electronically on the common portal within twenty four hours of generation of the e-way bill: Provided that an e-way bill cannot be cancelled if it has been verified in transit in accordance with the provisions of rule 138B: Provided further that the unique number generated under sub-rule (1) shall be valid for a period of fifteen days for updation of Part B of FORM GST EWB-01." 9. The Rule does not prescribe that the dealer must necessarily cancel the e-way bill if no transportation of the goods is made within 24 hours of its generation. It certainly does not provide any consequence that may follow if such cancellation does not take place. On .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that it was clearly established that the assessee had made double use of the e-way bills is merely a conclusion drawn bereft of material on record. It is the reason based on facts and evidence found by the assessing authority that has to be examined to test the correctness of the order and not the conclusions, recorded without any material on record. 12. Then, as to the power of the appeal authority to entertain additional evidence, again, there can be no doubt that Rule 112 of the Rules does not allow for additional evidence to be led at the instance of the respondent in the appeal. In the case of penalty or assessment, where the appeal may be filed by the assessee alone, the correctness of the order is to be tested on the strength of th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 129(3) of the Act. He simply rejected the explanation furnished by the assessee without recording any reason and consequently imposed tax and penalty. 14. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to remand the proceeding now as that would amount to giving the revenue a second inning to built a fresh case that too after being aware of the defense set out by the assessee in the first leg of the proceedings. The order dated 3.12.2019 passed by the proper authority under Section 129(3) of the Act is found to be perverse and is set aside. Any amount that may have been deposited by the petitioner-assessee, may be returned to it, in accordance with law. 15. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed.
Case laws, Decisions, Ju .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates