TMI Blog2021 (4) TMI 611X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ns for filing of written submissions and judgments. These procedural issues are to be regulated by the NCLAT on its own. This Court does not deem it appropriate to interfere with the same - The manner in which the Petitioner seems to be making repeated representations and submissions before the NCLAT clearly shows that the Petitioner is not being bonafide in his conduct. The Petition is dismissed with costs of ₹ 10,000/- to the High Court of Delhi (Middle Income Group) Legal Aid Society . - W.P.(C) 4338/2021 & CM APPL. 13253/2021 - - - Dated:- 9-4-2021 - JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Singh Bakshi, Advocate for R-2,3,4 and9. Prathiba M. Singh, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Apart from that, the Petitioner submits that he has also made representations to the Chairperson and the other members of the Board, however to no effect. The Petitioner further submits that he has filed his written submissions, but it is clear from the orders that have been passed by the NCLAT that copies of the same are being directed to be provided to the Respondents. Aggrieved by all these three impugned orders, he has approached this court in this writ petition. 5. The orders of the NCLAT which are under challenge read as under:- 1) 12.10.2020: It is stated that Notice by e-mail, has been sent to Respondent Nos. 4 to 7. Appellant states that they are served by other modes also. The Appellant says that he does not want to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... party in person accepts that he has filed brief Written-Submissions Diary No. 23101 in three volumes and a paper Book of index marked as Copy-I. Learned Counsel for Respondent submits that she has been given only copy of Appeal Paper Book Diary No. 20685. Learned Counsel for Respondent states that she has already served the copy of Written Submissions she filed vide Diary No. 23181. Perused order dated 17th December, 2020. The Appellant states that he will not be able to provide copy of the brief Written-Submissions titled as Copy-I and the Volumes I to III filed vide Diary No. 23101. He states that he has made representation to the Hon ble Acting Chairperson and the Hon ble Members of this Appellate Tribunal as to under what provisio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uted Appellate Tribunal, under the IBC, is free to regulate its procedure and the manner in which it wishes to hear matters, including issuing of directions for filing of written submissions and judgments. These procedural issues are to be regulated by the NCLAT on its own. This Court does not deem it appropriate to interfere with the same. 10. The manner in which the Petitioner seems to be making repeated representations and submissions before the NCLAT clearly shows that the Petitioner is not being bonafide in his conduct. Even on an earlier occasion, the same Petitioner had filed a petition, using slang language, which was dismissed by this Court, vide order dated 26th February 2021 in CM(M) 165/2021 titled GP Capt Atul Jain v. Nati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
