9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (5) TMI 84X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... undering Act, 2002 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act of 2002). 2. Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.289/2013 was registered by ACB, Jaipur against Mahesh Chand Sharma (the present petitioner), T. Dileep Kumar and Rajendra Prasad Saini for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act of 1988) and also under Sections 384 and 120-B of I.P.C. 3. After investigation, the Investigating Agency i.e. ACB, Jaipur filed charge-sheet in relation to FIR No.289/2013 on 16.08.2013 before the Sessions Court of Special Judge, Designated Court (Prevention of Corruption Act), Jaipur against the petitioner and co-accused persons. Again on 30.09.2013, anothe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l further submits that the petitioner has not misused the liberty of bail granted to him under the scheduled offences. Counsel further submits that the law involved in this matter has been considered by the Coordinate Bench of this Court while granting bail to the co-accused persons. Counsel further submits that the co-accused who is son of the petitioner has already been released on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.02.2021 and prayed that the petitioner may also be released on bail. 6. In support of his contentions, counsel for the petitioner relied upon the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Kiran Prakash Kulkarni Vs. The Enforcement Directorate & Anr., Special Leave to Appeal Crl. No ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Vs. Govt. of India, Blapl No.2607/2020 decided on 13.07.2020. Counsel further relied upon the judgment passed by the High Court of Patna in the matter of Vidyut Kumar Sarkar @ Ashok Das Vs. State of Bihar & Ors., Criminal Miscellaneous No.73325/2019 decided on 18.06.2020. Counsel further relied upon the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi Vs. Upendra Rai, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No(s).5150/2020 whereby the order dated 09.07.2019 passed by the High Court of Delhi granting bail to the accused has been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 03.06.2020. 10. I have heard counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. 11. In the present case, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
