9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (11) TMI 590X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ircar, Adv. Ms. Mamta Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Ravi Mishra, Adv. and Ms. Amrita Kumari, AOR. For the Respondent : None. ORDER M.R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.06.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail No.6648 of 2021 by which the High Court has refused the prayer of the applicant for gran ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d against the petitioner and other co-accused as far as back on 20.11.2018. Earlier the petitioner moved an application before the High Court to quash the charge-sheet, in exercise of powers under Section482 Cr.P.C. which came to be dismissed by the High Court vide order dated10.12.2019. However, though not permissible the High Court vide order dated10.12.2019 directed that in case the applicant a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has observed that even in the first FIR one person was shown as unknown. Thus, from the aforesaid it is found that there is a prima facie case found against the petitioner for the aforesaid offences and even the charge-sheet has been filed and the petitioner is found to be absconding. Therefore, this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The Court shall not come to the re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
