9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (12) TMI 1147X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... zed Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER : S.K. MOHANTY Heard both sides and perused the records. 2. The issue involved in this appeal for consideration by the Tribunal is, whether the appellant is eligible to avail suo moto Cenvat Credit of Central Excise duty, without sanction by the proper department. Both sides agree that the issue arising out of the present dispute is no more res i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... statement etc. cannot be pressed upon, justifying issuance of show cause notice beyond the normal period. 3. I find that the period in dispute involved in this case is October 2005 and the show cause notice was issued on 09.03.2009 i.e. much after the normal period prescribed under Section 11A ibid. Insofar as invocation of the proviso to Section 11A ibid is concerned, it has been mandated that o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Wonderax Laboratories I.P.L., reported in 2010 (255) ELT 60 (Del.) has held that when conflicting views were taken with regard to interpretation of Notification etc., the proviso clause appended to Section 11A ibid cannot be invoked, justifying recovery of the short levied duty etc. beyond the normal period of limitation. The department in this case has not specifically adduced any evidence to s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
