Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1983 (7) TMI 34

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . But the father of the plaintiff was again called upon by the Certificate Officer by letter dated January 15, 1957, to pay a sum of about Rs. 1,500 by way of interest on the arrears of income-tax which was assessed against him. The appellant put in his objection which was disallowed and a distress warrant was issued against him for recovery of the said dues by the Certificate Officer. The objection that was raised was that this amount was an illegal demand after the payment of the dues by instalments on the basis of the order of the Certificate Officer and same not being a public demand, was not recoverable under s. 16 of the Public Demands Recovery Act and, therefore, the proceeding initiated against the plaintiff's father and others was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, no fresh certificate for the claim was signed or issued, but demand was made by letter dated January 15, 1957. So, there can be no question of cancellation of any certificate for realisation of the present claim for interest. The other prayer was for declaration that the payment of interest in the proceeding for recovery thereof is illegal and ultra vires. According to the learned judge, the disputes were entertainable by a civil court and he held that the prayer for such a declaration is maintainable. No objection was raised by the debtors to the demand and, in fact, they admitted the liability and prayed for payment of the dues by instalments. Accordingly, the Certificate Officer made an order for p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ecovery of the interest in respect of the certificate filed under the Act. Therefore, no fresh certificate of demand need be signed or put into execution and the dues are recoverable in the proceeding which is a continuation of the same proceeding started on the certificate issued on the original demand. Hence, it was held by the learned judge that the procedure was in conformity with the law and, accordingly, overruled the objections made by the appellants. Two cases, however, have been cited by the learned advocate for the appellant in support of his contention that the proceedings are not legal namely, Khardah Co. Ltd. v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1969 Cal 284. In this case also there was no dispute about the original certificate amou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ecause that would be merely postponing the evil day. The question, therefore, is as to whether interest, costs and charges are at all payable. We have to come back to s. 16 because that is the most important section that creates the liability to pay interest, costs and charges. Mr. Bhabhra interprets it to mean that the liability to pay interest, costs and charges is subject to the existence of execution proceedings. In other words, when the principal sum due on a certificate is paid at a time when no execution proceeding is actually pending, the liability to pay interest, costs and charges do not accrue. In my view, this is not correct interpretation of s. 16. Under s. 16, interest, costs and charges are payable with regard to the publi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is alleged. The TRO has to proceed to investigate such claim or objection and it is only after the completion of such investigation and the making of an order by the TRO that a party aggrieved by such order may bring a suit in the civil court. On the basis of this judgment, the learned advocate for the respondents has argued that the suit itself is not maintainable as the proceeding was not first taken before the certificate officer. Only after that procedure is exhausted the appellant could go to a civil court. I think, there is much force in this argument and I hold that the suit, as framed, is not maintainable. Accordingly, I uphold the judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court and dismiss the appeal with costs. - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates