9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (3) TMI 1060X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ra , Ld. Adv. For the Respondents : Noopur K. Dalai , Ld. Adv. ORDER 1. The instant petition is filed on 04.02.2019 by Mr. Rohit Lalwani, the authorized signatory of M/s. Kerman and Company LLP, under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the "IBC, 2016") to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as the "CIRP") a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n 31.03.2016 GBP 1382.30 all the four invoice are of GBP 11,987.45. All these invoices are accepted by the Corporate Debtor without any dispute or objection. It is also stated that the Corporate Debtor also acknowledged the debt on 05.01.2016. 4. The Operational Creditor also stated that the Corporate Debtor failed to pay the outstanding amount even after several reminders and requests, thereupon ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... igations filed against GGK, due to complexity with GGK, the U.K. based company, and also were not replying properly to the email of the Corporate Debtor. 7. The Corporate Debtor further submitted that the Operational Creditor has not approached this Adjudicating Authority with clean hands. The Operational Creditor has suppressed a material fact in its petition. Prior to filing of this petition, t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... perused the material available on record. It appears that four invoices totalling GBP 11,987.45 were raised by the Operational Creditor for legal services rendered to the Corporate Debtor. Three invoices dated 05.01.2015, 13.07.2015, 06.10.2015 are beyond the period of limitation of three years but the invoice raised on 31.03.2016 of GBP 1382 (equivalent to Rs. 11,03,745.75) is within the limitati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
