Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (7) TMI 263

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (A), Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad & CIT(A)-13, Ahmedabad for the Assessment Years 2013- 14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 respectively. 2. As identical grounds have been raised in all these three appeals, grounds raised in ITA No.1229/Ahd/2018 for A.Y. 2013-14 are reproduced as under :- "1. The learned CIT(A) has erred both in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the action of the AO of making a disallowance u/s.40A(2) of the Act of interest of Rs.3,49,477/- as being excessive and unreasonable. 2. The learned CIT(A) has erred both in law and on the facts of the case in not appreciating that the lender does not fall under the provisions of Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act. 3. Alternatively and without prejudice, the learned CIT(A) has erred both .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ly ignoring various submissions, explanations and information submitted by the appellant from time to time which ought to have been considered before passing the impugned order This action of the lower authorities is in clear breach of law and Principles of Natural Justice and therefore deserves to be quashed. . 4. The learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in confirming action of the learned AO in levying interest u/s 234A/B/C of the Act. 4. The learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in confirming action of the learned AO in initiating penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act." 4. The assessee derives income from manufacturing and dealing in Chemicals and trading of Grey Cloths. Return of income was e-filed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and risk involved by the assessee firm. The assessee firm paid total interest of Rs.71,88,467/- out of which interest of Rs.17,51,519/- was paid against unsecured loans taken from different parties. The Ld. AR further submitted that the list of parties to whom the assessee firm paid interest of Rs.17,51,519/- which was before the Assessing Officer as well as before the CIT(A). Ld. AR submitted that copies of confirmation of these accounts of the said parties were also submitted during the assessment proceedings. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has also given the details of interest payment in excess of 18% in respect of Naimish Jayantilal Choksi as the assessee firm paid interest to the said parties as the said party was engaged in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lable on record. The assessee is admitting that the interest expenses were higher than the normal interest rate available in the market. The requirement of the funds for urgency of the business can be the criteria to raise the interest rate i.e. 36%. At the time of submission the assessee submitted that the assessee has given the details of interest payment in excess of 18% in respect of Naimish Jayantilal Choksi and it is undisputed fact that the assessee firm paid the said interest to the said party. It was never disputed by the Revenue that the said loan facility was availed by the assessee for business purpose only. The day-to-day business activity requires cash flow regularly and to fill up the gap of cash flow and working capital requ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ght in making the addition on ad-hoc basis and has totally ignored the evidences put up by the assessee before the Revenue authorities. The CIT(A) has simply confirmed addition and ignored the evidences filed before the Assessing Officer. Therefore, ground no.2 is allowed. 13. As regards ground no.3 is concerned, the same is general in nature and hence dismissed. 14. As regards ground nos.4 & 5, the same are consequential and are not adjudicated at this juncture. Therefore, ITA No.1229/Ahd/2018 for A.Y. 2013-14 filed by the assessee is partly allowed. 15. As regards ITA No.1230/Ahd/2018 for A.Y. 2014-15, grounds are identical to that of A.Y. 2013-14 and hence the same is also partly allowed. 16. As regards ITA No.622/Ahd/2019 for A.Y. 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates