TMI Blog2022 (7) TMI 1225X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r is a Proprietrix of M/s.AKM Traders, having administrative office at No.29, Maruthi Nagar, Chinnakangarakuppam, Cuddalore, involved in trading of steels and allied products. The 1st petitioner is the husband of the 2nd petitioner, who is helping the 2nd petitioner in the business of trade. The said Trading company was registered with Cuddalore GST. While so, the 1st petitioner was orally summoned by the respondent to appear on 14.03.2022, accordingly, the 1st petitioner appeared and explained the activities of the business. When the 1st petitioner had gone there, he was made to stay from 11.00 a.m., to 11.00 p.m., thereafter, he was asked to come again on 15.03.2022 and again he went to the office of the respondent, he was once again made ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... verse the same immediately with interest and penalty as applicable. 5. For confirmation of the payment and further facts & evidences, when he was contacted on 24.03.2022, A1 came to the office on its own at about 12:30 Hrs, and promised to make complete payments by 25.03.2022 and will furnish a copy of payment challan & other proof by 14.00 Hrs. While awaiting their response, we have received a call from unknown no, introducing himself Advocate, Practicing in Hon'ble High Court of Madras and intimated about a petition filed by the Petitioner 1& 2 against us. 6. It is also submitted that Petitioner No.1 has never been asked to appear in the office on 14.03.2022& 15.03.2022. In fact, he has never been in the office on 14.03.2022, and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nature within the purview of Acts & rules applicable. It is also submitted that Petitioner No.2 have never appeared in this office, so far." 5. Mr.N.P.Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the respondent are not harassing the petitioners. The petitioners have claimed the benefits based on fake invoice received from the third parties. For the purpose of investigation, the respondent have summoned the petitioners and third parties in accordance with Section 70 of the GST Act, 2017 and the petitioners are duty bound to appear before them. He would also reiterate that the respondent are not harassing the petitioners and that the petitioners are not cooperating for the investigation. He would also submi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|