2008 (4) TMI 72

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . [Order per : S. S. Kang, Vice-President] - 1. Since the issue involved in both these stay applications is common, they are being taken up together. 2. Applicants filed these applications for waiver of pre-deposit of amount of service tax and penalty. Demand is confirmed on the ground that the applicants were providing business auxiliary service to the petroleum company. Contention of the appli .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bank. In similar facts, in the case of Shri Vijay Kumar & Ors. v. CCE, Ludhiana vide stay order dated 27-2-2008 the Tribunal has directed the applicants to deposit almost 50% of the amount in dispute. In view of the earlier stay order of the Tribunal, applicants are directed to deposit Rs. 35,000/-each in addition to the amount already deposited by the applicants. On deposit of the above directed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X