2008 (3) TMI 231

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i Vineet Ohri, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent.  [Order per : chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. 2. In the case of the appellants the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided against the appellants holding the impugned goods chargeable to higher rates of duty leading to payment of the differential duty by the appellants. The decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been reported in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in the case of Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. UOI- 1997 (89) E.L.T. 247 (S.C.). 3. We find that the case of the appellant was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court and it has been decided against them and as such, the matter has reached finality leading to payment of additional duty by the appellants. In the case of Goodyear, where a contrary decision has been rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X