Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (3) TMI 1008

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder of the learned Single Judge is challenged on the following premise: It is submitted that the order-in-original denying Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respect of the removal of goods on stock transfer basis to their own Units at Jamshedpur and Uttarakhand, is contrary to the order of the Division Bench of this Court in the appellant's own case. Secondly, denial of credit of service tax on outward transport incurred for removal of goods from the appellant-factory to the premises of the customer, is arbitrary and illegal. Thirdly, the learned Judge erred in rejecting the contention of the writ petitioner-Company (appellant herein-assessee) that the impugned order in the Writ Petition suffers from violation of principles of natural justice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for CENVAT Credit. The relevant portion of the above said judgment of the Division Bench of this Court, containing the conclusion, is extracted hereunder: "13. Therefore, we allow the Appeals of the Assessee and set aside the order of the Adjudicating Authority as well as the Tribunal and direct the Revenue Department to allow the Cenvat Credit in respect of Service Tax paid by the Assessee on transport of its goods from its Chennai Unit 1 to Jamshedpur Unit 2 in the present case. No costs" Insofar as the GTA (Goods Transport Agency) service tax from the appellant-assessee's factory to its Units by way of stock transfer, is concerned, we find that the order-in-original is unsustainable, insofar as it rejects the assessee's claim .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the respondent. 6. In the above circumstances, we are of the view that the order of the respondent, dated 08.01.2019, warrants interference by this Court. 7. For the above reasons, the said order dated 08.01.2019 is set aside. It is open for the appellant-assessee to submit their objections and file necessary documents before the respondent-authority by placing reliance on the Division Bench decision of this Court, dated 20.08.2019 (supra) and another decision of this Court, dated 10.06.2022 in W.P.No.1739 of 2019 (Alkraft Thermotechnologies Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise and Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals-I), within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates