2023 (7) TMI 600

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR Mr. A.S.vairawan, Adv. Mr. R.Sudhakaran, Adv. Mr. Vikashrajkumar, Adv. Mr. D.Subrahmanya Bhanu, Adv. Mr. T.Hariharasudhan, Adv. Mr. K. Devendran, Adv. Mr. D.Alagendran, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. B. Karunakaran, Adv. Ms. Balambihai, Adv. Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi, AOR ORDER Delay condoned. Application for substitution is allowed. Cause .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tantial questions of law, but relies upon Section 4 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 ('1988 Act'), a plea and contention which was never raised by the respondents, to dismiss the appeal. Our attention is drawn to the exceptions carved out to Section 4 of the 1988 Act. According to the appellants, the exceptions are applicable in the present case. Further, as per the appellants, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... this order of remit, would not be treated as observations and findings on the merits of the case of either side. All questions and issues are left open. The parties will appear before the High Court on 23.02.2023, when a date of hearing will be fixed. The appeal is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orde .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X