TMI Blog2023 (8) TMI 767X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... LD THAT:- A perusal of record, as presently made available to us, does seem to indicate that no material or information has been furnished to the petitioner, in support of the allegations levelled against him. The impugned order only adverts to the fact, that in a search action against Jignesh S Shah and another person i.e., Sanjay Shah, certain information emerged, which seemed to suggest that th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher And Hon'ble Ms. Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju For the Petitioner : Ms Ananya Kapoor and Mr Sumit Lal Chandani, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr Sunil Agarwal, Sr Standing Counsel on behalf of Mr Abhishek Maratha, Advocate ORDER [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM No. 3892/2023 1. Allowed, subject to just exce ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e dated 08.06.2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act. 5. The impugned notices and order concern Assessment Year (AY) 2014-2015. 6. The record shows, that the principal allegation against the petitioner is, that he is a beneficiary of accommodation entries provided by one Jignesh S Shah. It is alleged, that fictitious loan was accepted by the petitioner amounting to Rs.7,59,50,185/-. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or information has been furnished to the petitioner, in support of the allegations levelled against him. The impugned order only adverts to the fact, that in a search action against Jignesh S Shah and another person i.e., Sanjay Shah, certain information emerged, which seemed to suggest that they were in the business of providing accommodation entries. 11. It is also suggested, that Directors ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
