Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (11) TMI 1084

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eveals that the present ECIR dated 17.07.2023 was recorded by the respondent ED, as Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 is a scheduled offence under the PMLA, whereunder the complaint was registered for the illicit export of foreign currency. The facts also reveal that dismissal of the adjudication proceedings against the petitioner vide order in PAWAN MUNJAL VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI [ 2022 (4) TMI 212 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] has led to the petitioner being absolved of all charges. In fact, the Division Bench of this Court in CUSAA No.3/2023 has affirmed the same vide order dated 05.10.2023. Considering what is borne out from the aforesaid and finding merit in the submissions made by the learned senior counsels for the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondent/ Directorate of Enforcement ( ED ) for calling all records of ECIR/DLZOI/39/2023 dated 17.07.2023 and quashing the aforesaid ECIR/DLZO-I/39/2023 dated 17.07.2023 and all proceedings emanating therefrom. 4. Issue notice. 5. Learned Special Counsel appearing for the respondent ED accepts notice. He seeks, and is granted, four weeks for filing a reply. 6. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. 7. Accordingly, renotify on 21.03.2024. CRL.M.A. 31441/2023 (for stay) 8. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking ex-parte ad-interim stay of the proceeding in ECIR .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be prosecuted on notional basis or an assumption that a scheduled offence has been committed. They further submit that once the petitioner stands exonerated by the CESTAT and the proceedings initiated by the Department of Revenue stand stayed by this Court vide order dated 03.11.2023, the proceedings under the PMLA cannot be allowed to continue against the petitioner as the same shall amount to abuse of the process of law. 11. Per Contra, learned special counsel appearing for the respondent ED on advance notice opposes grant of stay by drawing attention of this Court to the order dated 05.10.2023 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in CUSAA No.3/2023 to submit that the said order is irrelevant to the present proceedings as the su .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ca Bedi v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2011) 1 SCC 284, he submits that in any event, there is no bar on two or more prosecutions arising out of the same set of facts, if it can be shown that the ingredients of the two different offences, have been made out. 14. He further submits that the petitioner is not covered by the judgment passed in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (supra) as the offence under the PMLA being a standalone offence is not predicated on the offence committed under the Customs Act. He further submits that in any case, the benefit can only be given when the accused is discharged, whereas in the present case, only the proceedings have been stayed, and the petitioner has not been finally discharged/ acquitted in Ct. Case No.2012/20 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion under the PMLA (para 4.1) reveals that the present ECIR dated 17.07.2023 was recorded by the respondent ED, as Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 is a scheduled offence under the PMLA, whereunder the complaint was registered for the illicit export of foreign currency. 19. The facts also reveal that dismissal of the adjudication proceedings against the petitioner vide order dated 28.03.2022 in Appeal No.50497/2022 titled as Pawan Munjal v. Commissioner of Customs passed by the CESTAT has led to the petitioner being absolved of all charges. In fact, the Division Bench of this Court in CUSAA No.3/2023 has affirmed the same vide order dated 05.10.2023. 20. It is also to be noted that this Court, after taking note of the order passed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates