2024 (1) TMI 990

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggu, Mr. Vikas Sareen, Ms. Maninder Kaur, Ms. Oshin Maggu and Mr. Sidhant Krishna Yadav, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Mishra, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Rahul Bansal, Mr. Parvesh Bansal, Ms. Ankita R. Mishra and Ms. Chetna Singhal, Advocates. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... weeks thereafter. The adjudicating authority was directed to fix a date for cross examination of the witnesses referred to in paragraph 79 (B to H). 4. We are informed that an interim reply has already been filed by the petitioner. 5. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to permit further cross-examination of witnesses. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that refusal to grant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be extended to the petitioner. He submits that he would be satisfied in case time is enlarged to file final written submissions and a personal hearing is given to the petitioner. 9. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, submits that Adjudicating Authority shall grant a personal hearing to the petitioner after the response being filed by the petitioner. 10. In view of the above, th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X