9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (3) TMI 1128X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , Ms. Ishita Farsaiya and Ms. Vanshika Taneja, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal, ASC JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 30.12.2023, whereby the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 25.09.2023, proposing a demand against the petitioner has been disposed of and a demand of Rs. 2,18,73,860.00 including penalty has been raised against the petit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rs, return defaulters and tax nonpayers. To the said Show Cause Notice, a detailed reply was furnished by the petitioner giving full disclosures under each of the heads. 5. The impugned order, however, after recording the narration, records that the reply uploaded by the taxpayer is not clear and unsatisfactory. It merely states that "And whereas, the taxpayer had filed their objections/reply in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dated 30.12.2023 is not sustainable for the reasons that the reply filed by the petitioner is a detailed reply. Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion whether the reply was incomplete, not duly supported by adequate documents and unsatisfactory. He merely held that the reply is not clear and unsatisfactory which ex-facie shows that Proper Officer has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... reply is not clear, unsatisfactory, incomplete and not duly supported by adequate documents. Proper Officer is directed to intimate to the petitioner details/documents, as maybe required to be furnished by the petitioner. Pursuant to the intimation being given, petitioner shall furnish the requisite explanation and documents. Thereafter, the Proper Officer shall re-adjudicate the show cause notic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
