1979 (1) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nafter referred to as "the Act", the following question has been referred : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Rs. 33,394 being the urban land tax for Faslis 1373 to 1376, both inclusive, paid by the assessee during the relevant previous year in respect of the urban land on which it was carrying on the business is to be deducted in the assessment for the assessment year .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 6th November, 1970, respectively, both payments falling during relevant previous year. The first of the payments was in respect of the Faslis 1373 and 1374 and the second in respect of Faslis 1375 and 1376. The assessee claimed the total sum of Rs. 33,394 as deduction allowable in the year under consideration. The ITO held that there was no provision for allowing as deduction, the urban land tax, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e date on which it accrues have been the subject of notice in our decision in T.C. No. 102 of 1975 (CIT v. M. CT. Muthiah) dated January 17, 1979-[1979] 118 ITR 104. After briefly considering the provisions of that Act we pointed out in our judgment as under (p. 107): " Section 15 provides that in respect of the urban land tax payable for every Fasli year or part thereof there shall be a separate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X