9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (5) TMI 1385X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mar, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Prateek Badhwar, Ms. Shaguftha H. Badhwar & Ms. Samridhi Vats, Advocates.. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 23.07.022 whereby the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled retrospectively with effect from 01.07.2017. Petitioner also impugns Show Cause Notice dated 11.10.2021. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... said Show Cause Notice also does not put the Petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively. Accordingly, the Petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of the registration. 5. Thereafter, impugned order dated 23.07.2022 passed on the Show Cause Notice does not give any reasons for cancellation. It merely states that the r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... able shows nil demand. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions submits that after cancellation of the GST registration till the date petitioner has not carried out any business. 8. We notice that the Show Cause Notice and the impugned order are bereft of any details. Neither the Show Cause Notice, nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation. 9. In terms o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e respondent, one of the consequences for cancelling a taxpayer's registration with retrospective effect is that the taxpayer's customers are denied the input tax credit availed in respect of the supplies made by the taxpayer during such period. Although, we do not consider it apposite to examine this aspect but assuming that the respondent's contention in this regard is correct, it would follow t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
