2024 (1) TMI 1307

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... TICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI G.NATARAJAN, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI VADIRAJA PADAKANDLA AND MISS P. POOJA, ADVOCATES. FOR THE RESPONDENTS: SRI GIRISH HULMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI SHIVARAJ BALLOLLI, ADVOCATE FOR R3 ORDER This petition is filed challenging the order dated 04.09.2023, passed by respondent No.1 at Annexure-A, by which the petitioner is held liable to pay .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and though replied to the show cause notice, did not furnish any documents to substantiate that the services rendered by him were exempted under the notification. He further submitted that though several opportunities of personal hearing were provided to the petitioner, the same was not availed by the petitioner. Therefore, respondent No.1 left with no option, on the basis of available material on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r replied to the show cause notice stating that the services rendered are exempted from payment of service tax under the notification and therefore sought to drop the proceedings. 8. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that except stating that the services rendered are exempted from service tax, the petitioner has not produced any documents to substantiate that the services rendered by him .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X