Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (8) TMI 1124

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion quashing impugned order dated 22.11.2022 passed under section 154 of the Act and the prior approval purportedly granted by Respondent No. 2 before passing such order. B. Without prejudice to the above, issue a writ of and/or order and or directions in the nature of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14 and all notices/orders in relation thereto. AND C. Issue a writ of and/or order and/or direction in the nature of prohibition commanding Respondents to forebear from giving effect to and/or taking any step whatsoever pursuant to and/or in furtherance of the impugned order dated 22.11.2022 for AY 2013-14; AND D. Without prejudice t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Court on 22 September 2022 in the following terms: - "3. Issue notice. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents revenue, accepts notice. He states that he has no instructions in the present case. He, however, does not dispute that the income alleged to have escaped assessment is less than Rs.50,00,000/-. 4. This Court is of the view that the reopening in the present case is in violation of CBDT Instruction No. 01/2022 dated 11th May, .2022, wherein it has been clearly stated that notices in the cases pertaining to assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 cannot be issued, if the condition specified under Section 149 (1) (b) is not fulfilled namely that income alleged to have escaped assessment should be Rs. 50,0 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssessment was in fact more than INR 50 lakhs. That review petition, however, came to be dismissed with the Court observing that the so called "corrected order" had neither been issued nor served upon the assessee. In view of the above, the Court proceeded to reject the review petition subject to liberty being reserved to the respondents to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 6. It was on a perceived interpretation of the aforesaid liberty that the Assessing Officer [AO] sought to invoke the powers conferred by Section 154 of the Act and issued the notices impugned herein. 7. In our considered opinion, the AO had clearly lost sight of the fact that once the orders under Section 148 had been quashed, there existed no determinatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng the operation of the order under challenge, a distinction has to be made between quashing of an order and stay of operation of an order. Quashing of an order results in the restoration of the position as it stood on the date of the passing of the order which has been quashed. The stay of operation of an order does not, however, lead to such a result. It only means that the order which has been stayed would not be operative from the date of the passing of the stay order and it does not mean that the said order has been wiped out from existence. This means that if an order passed by the Appellate Authority is quashed and the matter is remanded, the result would be that the appeal which had been disposed of by the said order of the Appellat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t, therefore, be invoked and there was no impediment in the High Court dealing with the winding up petition filed by the respondents. This is the only question that has been canvassed in Civil Appeal No. 126 of 1992, directed against the order for winding up of the appellant-company. The said appeal, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed." 8. We note that the power under Section 154 could have been invoked provided an order capable of rectification existed in the eyes of law. However, once the original reassessment orders came to be quashed, they would be deemed to have never existed. All that the review Court did was to accord liberty to the respondents to issue a fresh or rectified order. That would have necessarily entailed an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates