Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (8) TMI 1398

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... visit, it was observed that the appellant had availed cenvat credit of Rs.12,71,720/- during the period August 2007 to March 2008. On verification, it was found that the goods claimed as inputs by the appellant were actually jumbo bags and these jumbo bags were printed with the name of the supplier and returned to them. In other words, the appellant availed cenvat credit on jumbo bags and after printing and repacking these jumbo bags cleared for export. Since the jumbo bags remained as jumbo bags and the process of printing and repacking did not amount to manufacture, the question of availing credit on the jumbo bags received by them was irregular, hence show-cause notice was issued and the cenvat credit amount of Rs.12,71,720/- was confir .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... so submitted that the following circulars allowed cenvat credit on the inputs that were used in the manufacture of goods exported. a. Circular No. 283/117/96-CX, dated 31. 12. 1996 b. Circular F.No. 345/2/2000-TRU, dated 29.08. 2000 2.1 The learned CA further submitted that the demand is also time barred as there is no suppression of facts. When certain information is not required to be supplied under law and the same is not reflected in their returns does not amount to suppression as held by the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Apex Electrical Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India: 1992 (61) ELT 413 (Guj.). The only allegation by the Revenue is that the jumbo bags were recorded as inputs in the stock register and the fact that the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Tariff Act amounting to manufacture (iii) which in relation to the goods specified in the third schedule involves packing or repacking of such goods..................... 5. In the instant case, the above Clause (ii) and (iii) are ruled-out, therefore, the only question remains is whether printing of the supplier's name on the jumbo bags amounts to manufacture. The jumbo bags received by the appellant even after printing remains as jumbo bags and the same are marketable even without printing. Hence, printing cannot be incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product as is held in the case of Brakes India Ltd. vs. Superintendent of Central Excise: 1998 (101) E.L.T. 241 (S.C.) where the Hon'ble Supreme Court clearly he .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... was noticed that they are availed credit on the final products claiming them to be the inputs also is the contention of the revenue. However, the appellant has alleged that the internal audit party visited the unit in the month of August 2008 and the department was aware of the fact that the credit was taken on jumbo bags as inputs and cleared the same after printing of the supplier's name, but show-cause notice was issued on 16.11.2009 only after the Accountant General's Office audited the records therefore, having not issued any notice after the first audit there cannot be any suppression. I agree with the contention of the appellant that the revenue was aware of the irregular of availment of credit in the month of August 2008 itself. Hav .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rson or his agent. There is no such averment to be found in the show cause notice. There is no averment that the duty of excise had been intentionally evaded or that fraud or collusion had been practiced or that the assessee was guilty of wilful misstatement or suppression of fact. In the absence of any such averments in the show-cause notice it is difficult to understand how the Revenue could sustain the notice under the proviso to Section 11-A(1) of the Act.' It was held that the show cause notice must put the assessee to notice which of the various omissions or commissions stated in the proviso is committed to extend the period from six months to five years. That unless the assessee is put to notice the assessee would have no opportuni .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates