2024 (9) TMI 1253

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ALE For the Appellant(s) Mr. N. Venkatraman, A.S.G. (NP) Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Sr. Adv. (NP) Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Adv. Mr. Nupur Sharma, Adv. Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Arkaj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Dr. C Manickam, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AOR Mr. Kapil Dev Yadav, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Sisodia, Adv. ORDER PER 1. We have heard Ms. Rukhmini .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ers (supra) may not be applicable in all aspects/issues, yet the CESTAT has concluded the appeals by simply applying the same. 4. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter back to CESTAT for a fresh decision after affording due opportunity to the parties concerned. 5. As the matter is an old one, CESTAT may make an endevour to decide the same as early as possible. 6. Al .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X