Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (1) TMI 1328

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f Income Tax Act simply on the basis of interest income reflected in 26AS. 2. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax- (Appeals) has wrongly confirmed the addition of Rs. 4377584 on the basis of interest income reflected in 2AS and he erred by not allowing interest expenses of Rs. 5149167, paid to bank. 3. that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred by not considering the facts, submission and remand report given by assessing officer. 4. That the Assessee craves for permission to add, amend, alter or withdraw any grounds of appeal with approval of the hon'ble bench. 3. Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessee filed her return of income declaring total income of Rs. 1,25,97,677/- which was processed under section 143(1)(a)(vi) by CPC Ban .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t any basis and facts on record. As already explained Smt. Charanjeet Kaur took a loan of Rs.5.00 crore from M/s Aditya Birla Capital on 17.3.2016 and said loan of Rs. 4,98,50,577/- were credited to her saving bank account No.50100018368912 with HDFC bank and from this account, loan of Rs. 4,99,00,000/- were advanced to M/s Jasmer Foods Pvt. Ltd. on 18.3.2016 through RTGS. Against this loan the following interest were charged by M/s Aditya Birla Capital from the Appellant. Date Amount of interest charged 15.04.2016 422918.00 15.05.2016 437500.00 15.06.2016 435973.00 15.07.2016 434432.00 15.08.2016 432878.00 15.09.2016 431310.00 15.10.2016 429728.00 15.11.2016 428133.00 15.12.2016 426523.00 15.01.2017 424900.00 15.02.2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ment order passed under section 143(3) dt. 08/03/2021 was placed on record. 6.3 It was further submitted that during the course of appellate proceedings, the Ld. CIT(A) also called for the remand report from the AO and on perusal of the remand report which found mention in the impugned order, it may be noted that no adverse finding has been recorded by the AO, the contents of the remand report are as under: "2. In this regard, it is to submit that on perusal of the documents file das additional evidence, it is noted that while processing the ITR u/s 143(1)(a) for A.Y. 2017-18 of the assessee Smt. Charanjeet Kaur, the CPC added Rs. 43,47,584/- in her taxable income which was the difference of amount shown in Form-26AS i.e. Rs. 52,55,261/- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 8 on 01.08.2017 declaring salary income at Rs. 1,18,80,000/- and income from other sources at Rs. 8,77,677/- (interest of Rs. 1,25,991/- + Dividend of Rs. 7,51,686/-) only. It is also a fact that the appellant had claimed TDS on interest of Rs. 5,25,379/- and TDS on salary of Rs. 39,60,972/-. With these details/information, the CPC processed the return of income of the appellant and found that the appellant failed to disclose the interest income of Rs. 43,77,584/-. Since, the provision of 143(1)(a)(vi) clearly mandates the AO to make the adjustment in total income on a/c of addition of income appearing in 26AS, which has not been included in computing the total income in the return, the CPC issued communication twice for proposed adjustment .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the interest income in the ITR, the adjustment in the ITR u/s 143(1)(a)(vi) of the Act is correctly made. Keeping in view the above facts of the case, I don't find any infirmity in the intimation order keeping in view the information available in ITR as well as 26AS for AY 2017-18. Thus, all the grounds of appeal is dismissed." 8. We have heard the rival contentions and purused the material available on record. We find that where the AO in the remand report has verified the matter and has also stated that in the subsequent year, same transaction has been accepted during the course of assessment proceedings, there is no merit in sustaining the addition so made in the impugned assessment year. The ld CIT(A) has merely gone by the quantu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates