2024 (12) TMI 1181

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... -
GST
MR. K. VINOD CHANDRAN AND MR. PARTHA SARTHY For the Petitioner's : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent's : Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG. Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. SC CGST & CX, Mr. Devansh Shankar Singh, Advocate JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved with the appellate orders passed against the rejection of refund applications filed by the petitioner. 2. The learned Counsel for the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... en dealt with. We extract the same hereunder:- "12. Now, there is no doubt that the appellant is engaged in trading only and was never engaged in adding value to the goods or manufacturing activity, which is sina qua non for claiming refund under inverted duty structure. It is established both from the examination of related documents and from physical verification of the business premises as we .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pay 20% of the tax demand as has been found in SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Others in C.W.J.C. No. 15465 of 2022. 8. We, hence, close the writ petition leaving the petitioner the remedy to file an appeal before the Tribunal, as and when it is constituted. 9. We make it clear that we have not made any observation on the merits of the matter and whatever has been recorded i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X