9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (2) TMI 195X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rav Joshi, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Nitin Jain, Mr. Ravi Shekhar Pandey, Mr. P. Kedia and Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma i/b. Agoma Law Associates. For the Respondent No. 5: Ms. Rinky Valanju a/w Mr. Hemant Dharap i/b. R. V. Legal. PC.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Mr. Joshi waives service on behalf of Respondent No. 2 and Ms. Valanju waives service on behalf of Respondent No. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al validity of Section 139AA of the said Act is already been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Binoy Viswam vs. Union of India & Ors. (2007) 7 S.C.R. Page 1. The limited interim reliefs granted in paragraph 125 of Binoy Viswam (supra) were pending the challenge to the Aadhaar scheme. The constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme was also upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ned any Aadhaar card, and on this ground, the facts in the present case are distinguishable. 9. At least prima facie, we cannot accept the above distinction. Considering that the vires of Section 139AA of the said Act is already upheld and the impugned Circular only seeks to implement Section 139AA, we decline any interim relief as prayed for by the Petitioner. 10. Further, we note that the Peti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
